 |
| Image Source: memphisactor.blogspot.com |
Method acting is gaining popularity because it forces actors to imbibe their characters more thoroughly as compared to traditional forms of acting. However, a recent opinion article published in the New Yorker questions this method’s stability and whether there are inherent dangers in allowing actors (a naturally emotional and volatile group of people) to fuse with their characters.
This technique is considered the most useful in delivering lifelike performances because it requires the actor to dig deep by practicing the mannerisms, lifestyle choices, tone of voice, and general frame of mind the role demands. The reproduction of action is combined with the actor’s careful consideration of the psychological motives and personal identification with the character. In theory, these strategies prevent any clichéd performances, which in turn lead to less direction from the director.
 |
| Image Source: newyorker.com |
Nevertheless, this demands the actor to congeal his personal and professional life. Early method acting notables such as Marlon Brando, Cary Grant, and Robert Mitchum, did not become the roles they were asked to play, but turned the characters into versions of themselves. The performances were not contrived, but reflected a barely held form of self-control. The result, of course, is brilliant. Audiences and fellow cast members can feel the passion and become more engaged with the method actor – but this encourages them to burn even brighter; and therein lays the danger.
 |
| Image Source: whatculture.com |
Ultimately, method acting is a useful technique and should be properly taught and understood by all actors – whether they are aspirants or veterans in the field. Remaining unaware of the hidden risks might dent the actor’s psyche in the long run.
Edoardo Costa, an Italian actor and model, is best known for his role in the Bruce Willis blockbuster, "Live Free or Die Hard". Learn more about him here.
